All apartments in Coto de Caza
/
/
58 Via Candelaria

58 Via Candelaria

(949) 204-2192

Price and Availability

Info provided by Listhub Api

Never miss a deal!
Get immediate alerts when prices drop or new units arrive.
Turn on alerts

Connect with 58 Via Candelaria

(949) 204-2192
Closed
Find apartments similar to 58 Via Candelaria
How many bedrooms do you need?

Location

58 Via Candelaria, Coto de Caza, CA 92679
Coto de Caza Golf and Racquet Club

Amenities

On-site laundry
Dogs allowed
Walk in closets
Dog park
Fireplace
Unit Amenities
fireplace
walk in closets
Property Amenities
dogs allowed
pet friendly
dog park
on-site laundry
Welcome to 58 Via Candelaria! This turnkey home is located on the North Golf Course in the highly coveted guard gated community of Coto de Caza. This 4 bedroom/3 bath home is approximately 2400sqft and has views for days! Upon entering, you are welcomed by soaring ceilings and plenty of windows that allow for an abundance of natural light. The first level boasts formal living and dining room, family room with fireplace, downstair bedroom with full bathroom, and laundry room. Upstairs the master bathroom has double sinks, separate shower and tub, and a walk-in closet. You will also find 2 additional oversized bedrooms, full bathroom, and large linen closet. The spacious backyard features panoramic golf course views off of the 8 tee box, grass area, and large seating area, all of which you can enjoy year round! Coto de Caza has many parks and hiking/biking paths and trails. Easy access to schools, shopping centers, and freeways.

Verified reviews

We are collecting reviews from verified residents who have toured or leased from 58 Via Candelaria. Check back soon.

Property Details (Fees & Lease)

Listing Provided by Listhub Api

Property Status: Active

Jackie Guthrie

Re/Max One

MLS Number: OC25165298

Copyright © 2025 California Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. All rights reserved. All information provided by the listing agent/broker is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed and should be independently verified.

Source

Frequently Asked Questions